[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [rfc] balance-on-fork NUMA placement

* Nick Piggin <> wrote:

> > _after_ the dup_task_struct(). Then change sched_fork() to return a
> > CPU number - hence we dont have a separate sched_fork_suggest_cpu()
> > initialization function, only one, obvious sched_fork() function.
> > Agreed?
> That puts task struct, kernel stack, thread info on the wrong node.

ok, i missed that - your patch looks then fine to me.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-01 08:21    [W:0.054 / U:1.296 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site