Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 1 Aug 2007 14:27:03 +0200 (CEST) | From | Roman Zippel <> | Subject | Re: CFS review |
| |
Hi,
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > [...] the increase in code size: > > > > 2.6.22: > > text data bss dec hex filename > > 10150 24 3344 13518 34ce kernel/sched.o > > > > recent git: > > text data bss dec hex filename > > 14724 228 2020 16972 424c kernel/sched.o > > > > That's i386 without stats/debug. [...] > > that's without CONFIG_SMP, right? :-) On SMP they are about net break > even: > > text data bss dec hex filename > 26535 4173 24 30732 780c kernel/sched.o-2.6.22 > 28378 2574 16 30968 78f8 kernel/sched.o-2.6.23-git
That's still quite an increase in some rather important code paths and it's not just the code size, but also code complexity which is important - a major point I tried to address in my review.
> (plus a further ~1.5K per CPU data reduction which is not visible here)
That's why I mentioned the increased runtime memory usage...
bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |