lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: CFS review
    Hi,

    On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:

    > * Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
    >
    > > [...] the increase in code size:
    > >
    > > 2.6.22:
    > > text data bss dec hex filename
    > > 10150 24 3344 13518 34ce kernel/sched.o
    > >
    > > recent git:
    > > text data bss dec hex filename
    > > 14724 228 2020 16972 424c kernel/sched.o
    > >
    > > That's i386 without stats/debug. [...]
    >
    > that's without CONFIG_SMP, right? :-) On SMP they are about net break
    > even:
    >
    > text data bss dec hex filename
    > 26535 4173 24 30732 780c kernel/sched.o-2.6.22
    > 28378 2574 16 30968 78f8 kernel/sched.o-2.6.23-git

    That's still quite an increase in some rather important code paths and
    it's not just the code size, but also code complexity which is important
    - a major point I tried to address in my review.

    > (plus a further ~1.5K per CPU data reduction which is not visible here)

    That's why I mentioned the increased runtime memory usage...

    bye, Roman
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-01 14:29    [W:4.221 / U:0.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site