Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:17:51 +0200 (CEST) | From | Bodo Eggert <> | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE] util-linux-ng 2.13-rc1 |
| |
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, DervishD wrote: > * Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de> dixit:
> > Standardisation is good, but autotools (as they are used) usurally isn't. > > Usually, by picking other's project configure.in and tweak blindly.
If it were that easy to write a correct automake script, people would do that. Wouldn't they?
> > Configuring the build of an autotools program is harder than nescensary; > > if it used a config file, you could easily save it somewhere while adding > > comments on how and why you did *that* choice, and you could possibly > > use a set of default configs which you'd just include. > > Looks like CMake...
Obviously something I should look at. -- Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say: 45. Was that YOUR directory? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |