lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>> For the tty layer I'm waiting for the revoke code to get finished up
>> and move from -mm into Linus tree. At that point the real evil
>> lock_kernel related stuff in the tty layer can switch to using the
>> revoke code for hangup paths and then other bits can be tackled.
>>
>
> oh, wonderful! Alan, you are a true wizard :-) The tty layer is one of
> the very few pieces of kernel code that scares the hell out of me :-)
>
>

Maybe it should be kept crufty then. Every kernel developer should have
at least one part of the kernel he's afraid to go into ;-)


--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-31 11:21    [W:0.161 / U:11.728 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site