lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND (updated)
    Date
    On Tuesday, 31 July 2007 06:59, Len Brown wrote:
    > On Sunday 29 July 2007 17:27, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > > Still, there are many other files in which CONFIG_PM can be replaced
    > > with CONFIG_PM_SLEEP or even with CONFIG_SUSPEND, but they can be updated in
    > > the future.
    >
    > There is #ifdef CONFIG_PM
    > around all the .suspend and .resume methods.
    >
    > Technically they are PM_DEVICE_STATES or something,
    > that could really be under PM, and both SUSPEND and HIBERNATE
    > would depend on PM_DEVICE_STATES, but it is also possible to have
    > PM_DEVICE_STATES without SUSPEND and HIBERNATE.

    Well, the people on linux-pm seem to agree that the .suspend() and .resume()
    callbacks are not suitable for runtime power management, so having them
    built without SUSPEND or HIBERNATION wouldn't be very useful. ;-)

    Greetings,
    Rafael


    --
    "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-31 11:09    [W:0.022 / U:59.500 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site