[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: LinuxPPS & spinlocks
    Hi Rodolfo,

    On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:

    > On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 10:39:38AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
    > >
    > > Nopes, this isn't quite correct/safe. I suggest you should read:
    > >
    > >
    > I read it but still I don't see why my solution isn't correct/safe. :)

    What does the section on locking between hard irq contexts (or between
    user process context and hard irq context) say?

    > Can you please propose to me your solution?

    As I said, you could just use the spin_lock_irqsave/restore() variants ...
    If you want, I can try and implement the other bits that I had suggested
    for the other things as well :-)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-30 11:21    [W:0.020 / U:21.888 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site