[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: LinuxPPS & spinlocks
Hi Rodolfo,

On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 10:39:38AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> >
> > Nopes, this isn't quite correct/safe. I suggest you should read:
> >
> >
> I read it but still I don't see why my solution isn't correct/safe. :)

What does the section on locking between hard irq contexts (or between
user process context and hard irq context) say?

> Can you please propose to me your solution?

As I said, you could just use the spin_lock_irqsave/restore() variants ...
If you want, I can try and implement the other bits that I had suggested
for the other things as well :-)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-30 11:21    [W:0.075 / U:7.620 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site