lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linus 2.6.23-rc1

* George Sescher <gesacs@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 30/07/07, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > i'd encourage you to do it - in fact i already tried to prod Peter
> > Williams into doing exactly that ;) The more reality checks a
> > scheduler has, the better. [ Btw., after the obvious initial merging
> > trouble it should be much easier to keep SD maintained against
> > future upstream kernels due to the policy modularity that CFS
> > introduces. (and which policy-modularity should also help reduce the
> > size and complexity of the SD patch.) ]
>
> <chuckle>
>
> You're advocating plugsched now?

hm, the way you posited this question implies that you see an
inconsistency in my position or that it surprised you - i cannot explain
the '<chuckle>' in any other way :) Which bit do you see as inconsistent
and/or which bit surprised you and why?

Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-30 08:47    [W:0.241 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site