Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:44:23 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1 |
| |
* George Sescher <gesacs@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30/07/07, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > i'd encourage you to do it - in fact i already tried to prod Peter > > Williams into doing exactly that ;) The more reality checks a > > scheduler has, the better. [ Btw., after the obvious initial merging > > trouble it should be much easier to keep SD maintained against > > future upstream kernels due to the policy modularity that CFS > > introduces. (and which policy-modularity should also help reduce the > > size and complexity of the SD patch.) ] > > <chuckle> > > You're advocating plugsched now?
hm, the way you posited this question implies that you see an inconsistency in my position or that it surprised you - i cannot explain the '<chuckle>' in any other way :) Which bit do you see as inconsistent and/or which bit surprised you and why?
Ingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |