[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
> > > > So to summarize, the plan that makes things work with fuse is:
> > > >
> > > >  - For STR, don't do the freezer thing.
> > > >
> > > >  - For STD, don't sys_sync() after you froze
> > > >
> > > > There might be -other- issues, but that should get you through some of
> > >
> > > At the risk of repeating myself. Character device drivers are written
> > > with the assumption that normal io and suspend/resume do not race
> > > with each other due to the freezer.
> > > What do you intend to do about that?
> >
> > Oliver, can you please explain your worries in a bit more detail?
> >
> > I don't claim to know anything about how STR or hibernate works, but
> > neither seem to have any problem with I/O on the fuse device "racing"
> > with them.
> The problem is not with fuse. The problem is generic in nature.
> If you remove the freezer, user space remains active until the last CPU
> goes into suspend. It can do syscalls. Or do you know a clean way to exempt
> only the tasks fuse might use?

You are talking about hibernate, right? Suspending (to ram) is
instantaneous, in that _after_ suspend no CPU is active obviously.

> Now device drivers have a guaranteed temporal sequence:
> last io -> suspend() -> resume() [or disconnect()] -> new io
> This is because suspend() is called after the freezer goes into action. If
> you remove the freezer, you need to deal with
> 1. io to suspended devices
> 2. resume() assuming that the device is in the state suspend() left it
> 3. io changing a device's state while suspend is saving it
> and you need to fix this for all device drivers, not just those fuse is
> involved with. Removing the freezer means doing a more or less full
> audit of every driver and additional locking in many drivers.

OK, this has _nothing_ at all to do with fuse then, and everything to
do with disk I/O.

Just because fuse is a filesystem, it doesn't have to do anything with
block devices, just like procfs doesn't either.

So removing the freezer from the hibernate path would be problematic,
but as I understand this is not what has been proposed, only removing
the freezer from the STR path, which should be OK.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-03 13:25    [W:0.211 / U:14.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site