[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v18
On 7/3/07, Ingo Molnar <> wrote:
> does it still get more CPU time than you'd expect it to get? A reniced
> or SCHED_IDLE task will 'fill in' any idle time that it senses, so in
> itself it's not an anomaly if a task gets 50% and FEH fills in the
> remaining 50%. Does it still get CPU time if you start two CPU hogs:
> for (( N=0; N < 2; N++ )); do ( while :; do :; done ) & done
> ? If yes, that would be an anomaly.

No, with this test, it gets the expected amount of CPU. Thanks for
clearing it up!

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-03 11:15    [W:0.065 / U:2.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site