[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:54:55PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > There's nothing wrong with it as such, it's just that our implementation
> > appears to suck in a myriad of small ways that keep cropping up and
> > biting people. Even without the sys_sync(), freezing processes results
> > in the suspend failing because syslog is stuck in D state and won't go
> > into the refrigerator.
> Okay, I can believe that. The proper response then is to fix the
> freezer, not eliminate it. Has the syslog problem been reported on
> linux-pm? I don't recall hearing of it before.

See the start of this thread. It's just not clear what the freezer buys
us - removing it gets rid of a load of subtle issues and complexity, and
turns system suspend into something that looks more like runtime
suspend (which might then encourage people to get runtime suspend

Matthew Garrett |
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-03 22:25    [W:0.165 / U:0.992 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site