[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:

> Well, but you did remove sys_sync() from the freezer, which is
> and must be called in the hibernate path.

That's not really true. We _want_ to call sys_sync() in both the
hibernate and suspend paths (in case the batteries run down), to help
avoid filesystem problems if something goes wrong with the resume. But
it isn't a hard requirement.

> > I'm not sure why this can't be made atomic, but assuming, that it
> > can't, fuse should still not need to be implicated. If it is, that's
> > an indication about something wrong in the suspend procedure.
> Nope, something's wrong in fuse. You must be able to deal with sync
> until every task is frozen.

That's ridiculous. FUSE itself runs partially as a user task. How can
you expect it to carry out a sync or anything else when it is frozen?

I suppose you could "deal" with it by having the kernel portion return
an error if the userspace part is frozen. If the hibernate/suspend
code bothered to check the return value, it would immediately abort
the suspend.

Alan Stern

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-03 22:05    [W:0.205 / U:5.792 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site