[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway
Am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2007 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> > > The main reason for deadlocks is because we do a sys_sync() after the
> > > freeze, which we shouldn't do.
> >
> > So why don't we remove the sys_sync() from freeze_processes() instead?
> The patch follows (untested).

And a further question. The freezer is not atomic. What do you do
if a task not yet frozen calls sys_sync(), but fuse is already frozen?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-03 20:29    [W:0.168 / U:16.480 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site