Messages in this thread | | | From | Oliver Neukum <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway | Date | Tue, 3 Jul 2007 20:26:34 +0200 |
| |
Am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2007 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > > > The main reason for deadlocks is because we do a sys_sync() after the > > > freeze, which we shouldn't do. > > > > So why don't we remove the sys_sync() from freeze_processes() instead? > > The patch follows (untested).
And a further question. The freezer is not atomic. What do you do if a task not yet frozen calls sys_sync(), but fuse is already frozen?
Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |