Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 3 Jul 2007 09:13:54 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Robert P. J. Day" <> | Subject | Re: shouldn't LVM support be selected by default? |
| |
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com> wrote: > > > just built a new kernel and didn't notice that support for LVM > > wasn't selected by default for x86. given what i thought was fairly > > widespread use of LVM2, wouldn't it make sense to have this option as > > part of the default config? > > If you don't know about LVM, you don't need it. Do you?
well, ok, i can go with that. thanks.
rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |