Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | [PATCH 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_HIBERNATION and CONFIG_SUSPEND (was: CONFIG_SUSPEND?) | Date | Sun, 29 Jul 2007 12:20:13 +0200 |
| |
On Saturday, 28 July 2007 20:31, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > OK, I'll prepare a patch to introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND, but that will require > > quite a bit of (compilation) testing on different architectures. > > Sure. I'm not too worried, the fallout should be of the trivial kind. > > Also, mind basing it on the (independent) cleanups that Adrian already > sent out. This is all intertwined..
OK, it took more time than I had hoped, but I wanted CONFIG_HIBERNATION and CONFIG_SUSPEND to be really independent of each other.
The two patches in the next messages implement the idea: * replace CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND with CONFIG_HIBERNATION * introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND that selects CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU, if necessary, and make it possible to choose suspend and hibernation independently of each other.
Greetings, Rafael
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |