Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 29 Jul 2007 10:51:00 +0200 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found... |
| |
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:31:54PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
[added to cc: Chuck Ebbert] > Borislav Petkov wrote: > >> > >> The absolute best would be if we could replicate this in simulation > >> (Bochs or Qemu); this would make it very simple to debug. Would you be > >> willing to try to do that? > > sure, will do, however i'll be busy at work/travelling tomorrow but as soon as i > > get home i'll whip up my qemu and run the kernel in question in it. However, > > Xudong said that grub 0.97 boots just fine on his machine and i think it'll be > > better to debug this right on the bare hardware (i.e. my laptop) ...? > > Suggestions ? > > If we can't reproduce the problem in simulation, that itself will tell > us something very important. If we *can* reproduce it in simulation, it > will be vastly easier to debug.
Hi Peter,
sorry for the delay, here's my report. I got the qemu linux image from the qemu website and did the following:
[boris@gollum:10:34:25:qemu:9553)-> qemu -kernel /boot/2.6.22-4fd06960f120e02e9abc802a09f9511c400042a5-12 -append "root=/dev/hda" linux-0.2.img
and the kernel did boot just fine so the problem should be pertaining only to the case when we boot on the bare hardware... -- Regards/Gruß, Boris. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |