[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

* John <> wrote:

> Ingo-
> Why not perform the same test using the native linux Q3 client to
> compare numbers to wine? [...]

I regularly test native Linux games on CFS, and they all behave well.
While waiting for more detailed data from Kasper i was looking for
atypical stuff in Kasper's description about what his workload involves,
and what looked a bit atypical was that Kasper's workload also involved
gaming under Wine:

> > > my test subjects are quake(s), world of warcraft via wine, unreal
> > > tournament 2004. [...]

and Wine is a more complex server/client scenario instead of a single
(and simple) standalone Quake3 binary that the Linux binary does. So it
looked more interesting from a scheduler workload (and scheduler
regression) POV. In any case i'll need more info from Kasper.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-29 22:49    [W:0.201 / U:0.352 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site