Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:18:49 -0700 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23] |
| |
Ray wrote: > Ah, so in a normal scenario where a working-set is getting faulted > back in, we have the swap storage as well as the file-backed stuff > that needs to be read as well. So even if swap is organized perfectly, > we're still seeking. Damn.
Perhaps this applies in some cases ... perhaps.
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |