[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] scheduler: improve SMP fairness in CFS
Tong Li wrote:
> Without the global locking, the global synchronization here is simply
> ping-ponging a cache line once of while. This doesn't look expensive to
> me, but if it does after benchmarking, adjusting sysctl_base_round_slice
> can reduce the ping-pong frequency. There might also be a smart
> implementation that can alleviate this problem.

Scaling it proportionally to migration cost and log2(cpus) should suffice.

> I don't understand why quantizing CPU time is a bad thing. Could you
> educate me on this?

It depends on how precisely you do it. We save a lot of power going
tickless. If round expiration is re-introducing ticks on idle CPUs, we
could waste a lot of power. Hardware is getting even more aggressive
about power saving, to the point of allowing individual cores to be
completely powered off when idle. We need to make sure the scheduler
doesn't interfere with power management.

-- Chris
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-29 05:05    [W:0.174 / U:1.296 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site