lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv
Date
On Fri 27 Jul 2007 06:18, Yoann Padioleau pondered:
> David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > Yoann Padioleau <padator@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> >
> >> When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to
> 0.
> >
> > Can you make them of style:
> >
> > if (!x)
>
> Yes I can. I can make another semantic patch later to do that
> transformation. But some people may prefer (x == NULL) to (!x)
> so I don't know. I think that transformation
> some 0 to NULL is less controversial.
>
>
> >
> > instead?

If there is a definite style or semantic preference that everyone should live
with - does it make sense to put checks in checkpatch.pl to enforce it?

-Robin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-28 03:37    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans