lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv
    Date
    On Fri 27 Jul 2007 06:18, Yoann Padioleau pondered:
    > David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> writes:
    >
    > > Yoann Padioleau <padator@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
    > >
    > >> When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to
    > 0.
    > >
    > > Can you make them of style:
    > >
    > > if (!x)
    >
    > Yes I can. I can make another semantic patch later to do that
    > transformation. But some people may prefer (x == NULL) to (!x)
    > so I don't know. I think that transformation
    > some 0 to NULL is less controversial.
    >
    >
    > >
    > > instead?

    If there is a definite style or semantic preference that everyone should live
    with - does it make sense to put checks in checkpatch.pl to enforce it?

    -Robin
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-28 03:37    [W:0.035 / U:0.808 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site