Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: [PATCH] ia64: fix build failure on fs/quota.c | From | Doug Chapman <> | Date | Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:58:45 -0400 |
| |
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 14:24 -0700, Luck, Tony wrote: > This issue wandered off onto a long thread "build fix for x86_64" which > died out without a final patch. Here's the summary: >
Ahh, thanks, I had not seen that thread.
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) || (defined(CONFIG_IA64) && defined(CONFIG_COMPAT)) > > It was pointed out that x86-64 also has a CONFIG_COMPAT, so the "right" > #ifdef mess would be: > > #if defined(CONFIG_COMPAT) && (defined(CONFIG_IA64) || defined(CONFIG_X86_64)) > > But this was thought too ugly. Andi Kleen proposed making a new CONFIG > variable for this situation: CONFIG_COMPAT_FOR_U64_ALIGMNENT which could > be set in ia64 and x86-64 Kconfig files with: > > config COMPAT_FOR_U64_ALIGMNENT > def_bool COMPAT > > So the C-code would simply have: > > #if defined(COMPAT_COMPAT_FOR_U64_ALIGMNENT) > > (IIRC the syntax correctly). Peter Anvin had some worries about future > issues ... but I think he agreed that this was Ok. > > Anyone still have any objections to this?
No objections here. I just tried this patch and it does fix my ia64 build issue. I agree it is a bit cleaner than the long #ifdef.
thanks,
- Doug
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |