Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:55:01 -0700 (PDT) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1 |
| |
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Len Brown wrote: > > Feel free to share what you know about the benefits vs. the costs > of maintaining CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP as a build option.
Why don't you just make CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP dependent on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND and STR?
> If you feel that your system has been degraded > because it now includes what used to be excluded under > CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=n, please let me know how.
I feel that I get asked to include a feature that (a) I have no interest in on that machine (b) I didn't need to include before.
What was the advantage? And what was it that caused something like this to be a post-rc1 thing. That makes me really unhappy. This is a *regression*.
Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |