[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Question] Hooks for scheduler tracing (CFS)
Mathieu Desnoyers <> writes:

> [...]
> The problem is also in _stp_print_flush, not *only* in relay code:
> void _stp_print_flush (void)
> ...
> spin_lock(&_stp_print_lock);
> ...
> spin_unlock(&_stp_print_lock);
> Those will turn into mutexes with -rt.

Indeed, plus systemtap-generated locking code uses rwlocks,
local_irq_save/restore or preempt_disable, in various places. Could
someone point to a place that spells out what would be more
appropriate way of ensuring atomicity while being compatible with -rt?

- FChE
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-26 16:51    [W:0.069 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site