[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] fs: Add romfs version 2

    > >> > block aligned regular file data to bring
    > >performance
    > >> > parity with ext2/3. This is about 225% of the read
    > >> > speed of the existing romfs.
    > >
    > >Doesn't that make these filesystems much bigger? By, on
    > >average, .5k
    > >per file? Or, if I'm understanding things correctly,
    > >~1k?
    > Yes, my experience has been that it has been almost
    > chillingly close
    > to .5k per regular file increase in partition size. I
    > know in
    > applications in which size is utterly critical this may
    > be slightly
    > unattractive, but in cases where romfs is chosen for its
    > byte
    > reproducibility and read-only nature the
    > size/performance tradeoff is
    > fairly advantageous.

    If the fs is read-only.. can we do some tail packing and get _both_
    speed and space efficiency?
    (cesky, pictures)
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-25 20:43    [W:0.019 / U:2.228 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site