Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Denis Cheng <> | Subject | [PATCH] gfs2/locking/dlm: use an temp variable to reduce a spin_unlock | Date | Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:53:58 +0800 |
| |
this is more clear.
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <crquan@gmail.com> --- fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/plock.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/plock.c b/fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/plock.c index fba1f1d..1f7b038 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/plock.c +++ b/fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/plock.c @@ -346,15 +346,16 @@ static ssize_t dev_write(struct file *file, const char __user *u, size_t count, static unsigned int dev_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait) { + unsigned int mask = 0; + poll_wait(file, &send_wq, wait); spin_lock(&ops_lock); - if (!list_empty(&send_list)) { - spin_unlock(&ops_lock); - return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM; - } + if (!list_empty(&send_list)) + mask = POLLIN | POLLRDNORM; spin_unlock(&ops_lock); - return 0; + + return mask; } static const struct file_operations dev_fops = { -- 1.5.2.2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |