Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:54:52 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: which signal is sent to freeze process? |
| |
Hi!
Can you generate small testcase that demonstrates the problem?
> Then what would be the correct way to handle resume process. The other > way of course is to make all the applications check the errno in case of > failure. But that seems more more problematic then system call checking. > What do you say?
Hmm, does that testcase behave correctly over SIGSTOP/SIGCONT? I'm not saying kernel behaves nicely here, but perhaps fixing the apps to check errno properly is the right thing to do? :-) Pavel
-- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |