[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/8] i386: bitops: Rectify bogus "Ir" constraints
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>> * The "I" constraint modifier is applicable only to immediate-value operands,
>> and combining it with "r" is bogus.
> This is wrong too.
> The whole point of a "Ir" modifier is to say that the instruction takes
> *either* an "I" or an "r".
> Andrew - the ones I've looked at were all wrong. Please don't take this
> series.

Incidentally, I just noticed the x86-64 bitops have "dIr" as their
constraint set. "d" would normally be redundant with "r", and as far as
I know, gcc doesn't prefer one over the other without having "?" or "!"
as part of the constraint, so is is "d" a stray or is there some meaning
behind it?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-23 20:45    [W:0.110 / U:2.964 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site