[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] readahead: scale max readahead size depending on memory size
On Sun, 22 July 2007 18:44:03 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > > I agree with the low point of 128k.
> >
> > Perhaps that should be enforced then, because currently a system with
> > <64M will get less.
> I think it should remain the low point.

I believe this whole thing is fundamentally flawed. The perfect
readahead size depends on the device in question. If we set a single
system-wide value depending on memory size, it may easily be too small
and too large at the same time. Think hard disk and SSD.

It may make sense to have a _maximum_ readahead size which depends on
memory size. But the preferred size (if there is enough RAM) should
depend solely on the device, possibly as a function of the
bandwidth * read latency product.


Joern's library part 12:
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-23 12:11    [W:0.095 / U:3.824 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site