lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] Re: Hibernation considerations
Date
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> writes:

> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
>> >> when doing a suspend-to-ram you get to a point where you just don't use
>> >> any userspace.
>>
>> > What do you mean? How can you prevent user tasks from running? That's
>> > basically what the freezer does, and the whole point of this approach
>> > is to eliminate the freezer. Right?
>>
>> Presumably no tasks at all would be scheduled.

> How would you prevent tasks from being scheduled? How would you
> prevent drivers from deadlocking because in order to put their device
> in a low-power state they need to acquire a lock which is held by a
> user task?

Perhaps this isn't an issue once the device is already quiesced. I'm
just conjecturing.

[snip]

--
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-21 00:51    [W:0.174 / U:0.816 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site