Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:48:43 +0200 | From | Stefan Richter <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 1/4] CONFIG_STABLE: Define it |
| |
Chris Snook wrote: > There are many different ways you can use it. If I'm writing a configurable > feature, I could make it depend on !CONFIG_STABLE, or I could ifdef my code out > if CONFIG_STABLE is set, unless a more granular option is also set. The > maintainer of the code that uses the config option has a lot of flexibility,
In other words, nobody will ever know what this config option really does.
> at least until we start enforcing standards. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -=== =-=-- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |