lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kill DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED
Hi Christoph,

On 7/20/07, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED was used for semaphores used as completions and
> we've got rid of them.

Thanks, I'd been meaning to do this for months :-)
Had even audited the kernel for its usage ... just didn't make or
send out a patch, sorry.

> Well, except for one in libusual that the
> maintainer explicitly wants to keep as semaphore.

That comment in libusual is quite nonsensical, IMHO. Note that
usu_init_notify is declared as DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED and yet the
author wants us to believe (later, when he's doing that dummy

down();
/* nothing here */
up();

stuff at line no. 181) that the semaphore is somehow "counted" ...
Has anybody tried going through all the logic in that file? Looks totally
weird to me ... :-) Nothing in there that can't be serialized using proper
primitives.

> So convert that
> useage to an explicit sema_init and kill of DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED so that
> new code is reminded to use a completion.

and I guess nobody cares a whit for the #if 0'ed stuff in drivers/fc4/fc.c

> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Well, probably not worth much, but: Ack.

Satyam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-20 07:31    [W:0.114 / U:0.416 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site