[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 0/6] sys_indirect RFC - sys_indirect introduction
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Ulrich Drepper wrote:

> > But there are
> > examples (and the signal stuff is one of them), where you do need the
> > set_context+syscall+unset_context abstraction, for all cases where the
> > kernel already has its own internal data strctures. In those cases you'd
> > have to spread sys_internal context knowledge all around the kernel,
> > whereas the current solution allows you to confine the code inside
> > kernel/indirect.c
> Nonsense. Whether you have a new word in the task structure or a
> pointer to a structure, you have to embed knowledge of this
> indirection in every affected code paths. There is no difference
> here. The only difference is that trying to force everything through
> an artificially complicated common entry code.
> I hope that Andrew+Linus will see through this. I'm done arguing.

I simply asked you to look how the code/patch would look like to handle
the ppoll/pselect/epoll_pwait stuff, and precisely where your changes had
to go. Or even in the exmaple Linus made of "make the fsuid/fsgid
temporarily be my _real_ uid/gid for this single system call" for what it

- Davide

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-03 02:39    [W:0.055 / U:1.788 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site