lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: instrumentation and kprobes really still "EXPERIMENTAL"?
On 7/1/07, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com> wrote:
> isn't kprobes mature enough to not be considered experimental anymore?

That would vary from arch to arch.

> in addition, while most of the KPROBES config options depend on
>
> KALLSYMS && EXPERIMENTAL && MODULES
>
> the s390 architecture depends only on
>
> EXPERIMENTAL && MODULES
>
> and its instrumentation support is *not* listed as experimental.
>
> also, the avr32 entry is in the file Kconfig.debug, and depends only
> on DEBUG_KERNEL. just an observation.

This probably stems from the episodic growth kprobes across different
archs. It can be cleaned up I suppose.

--
Abhishek Sagar

P.S: Adding systemtap in CC.
-
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-02 10:57    [W:0.397 / U:0.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site