[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 07:56:53AM -0500, Scott Preece wrote:
> On 7/19/07, James Morris <> wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> > If we could get a few (non-afilliated :) people who work with
>> > customers in the security field to tell us whether this is being
>> > used, that would be very helpful. Not sure how to get that.
>> The mainline kernel does not cater to out of tree code.
> Please distinguish between "cater to" and "support". If the kernel
> didn't worry about supporting out-of-tree code, then why would there
> be loadable module at all?

Distribution kernels need modules or the kernel images would be
extremely large.

> Another twist is to use a tool to generate the module from a
> policy-definition file; this could be done at boot-time or could be
> done to replace the current policy on a running system (perhaps to add
> a new domain corresponding to a newly added service). Yes, this would
> need to be done with a lot of care, but part of providing mechanism
> (rather than policy) is enabling people to use the mechanism in the
> ways they prefer.

Why do you need to generate a module for changing a policy?

Software like SELinux contains the mechanisms to change the policy
without having to change the kernel.

> scott



"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-19 15:19    [W:0.067 / U:12.792 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site