[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:

> > It's already pretty clear.
> I doubt anyone not on lkml or linux-security-module has heard of this.
> So we'll see.
> (I was, obviously, talking about end-users)

If distributions are shipping binary modules and other out of tree code to
their users, then they should bear responsibility for supporting and
maintaining the infrastructure required for it, and not expect upstream
maintainers to do it for them.

Additionally, if they want to expose their users to risks arising from
broken and unecessary infrastructure, then they should bear the cost and
responsibility of doing that and not expect others to do so as well.

I don't see how this is even slightly difficult to understand.

- James
James Morris
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-19 15:03    [W:0.077 / U:5.972 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site