Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:10:58 +0200 | From | "Jesper Juhl" <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.4.35 tree abandoned/delayed? |
| |
On 19/07/07, Tony Borras <tonyb@sysdev.org> wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:50:10 +0200 > Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: > > > Hi Tony, > > > > [ first, please always keep people in CC on LKML since it's > > very easy to > > miss a thread ] > > > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:23:57PM -0800, Tony Borras wrote: > > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:20:06 +0200 > > > Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: > > > > > > > could you please report what the problem was, in case it's > > > > not fixed yet ? > > > > > > Ok, reproduced error at ./net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c > > > line 436 changed label: > > > errout -> err_inval > > > > I don't know where you downloaded 2.4.35-pre5 from, but I've > > checked the sources and could not find any reference to > > "errout" here in any version! > > > > Or what is possible is that your 2.4.34 kernel got corrupted > > on your disk after applying any patch. Sometimes, some shell > > scripts providede with some > > Negatory on that, Willy! > > Here is what I have verified: > At kernel.org:/pub/linux/v2.4 > > file: patch-2.4.34.3.bz2 has the corruption at line 213: > goto errout > > That is where that came from, when I patched my 2.4.34 to arrive > at 2.4.34.5, before applying the 2.4.35.rc5 patch! > That sounds wrong. To the best of my knowledge, the 2.4.35-rc5 patch should be applied on top of 2.4.34, not on top of 2.4.34.5 ...
-- Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |