lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: uninline check_signature()
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > OR I'll have to disable HAS_IOMEM on m68k, and invent a new Kconfig
> > symbol for lots of other stuff that currently depends on HAS_IOMEM...
>
> Well, as far as I'm concerned, you could also make all drivers that
> actually need "check_signature()" do a Kconfig level
>
> select CHECK_SIGNATURE
>
> along with a
>
> config CHECK_SIGNATURE
> bool
> default n
>
> in lib/Kconfig, and thus make it totally independent of any hw/bus
> features at all, and simply depend on whether it is needed or not. I'd be
> ok with that, and it's certainly "correct" too.
>
> Hmm?

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> ;-)

(will cook a patch when I find a timeslot)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-18 08:47    [W:0.054 / U:4.400 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site