[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [kvm-devel] [RFC] Deferred interrupt handling.
> What if we will force the specific device to the end of the list. Once
> IRQ_NONE was returned by the other devices, we will mask the irq,
> forward the irq to the guest, issue a timer for 1msec. Motivation:
> 1msec is long enough for the guest to ack the irq + host unmask the irq

It makes no difference. The deadlock isn't fixable by timing hacks.
Consider the following sequence

Guest0 - blocked on I/O

IRQ14 from your hardware
Block IRQ14
Sent to guest (guest is blocked)

IRQ14 from hard disk
Ignored (as blocked)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-18 18:45    [W:0.105 / U:1.508 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site