Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:10:17 +0100 | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Subject | Re: Hibernation considerations |
| |
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 08:54:24PM -0700, david@lang.hm wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > >On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 08:19:32AM -0700, david@lang.hm wrote: > >>On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote: > >>>Powering off rather than using S4 means you lose most wakeup device > >>>support. That would be a functional regression compared to the current > >>>code. > >> > >>only if the kexec isn't able to initialize those devices. > > > >If you aren't using ACPI, you probably don't know how to. > > the current kexec patch to allow you to move back to the original kernel > requires ACPI be disabled to work.
Which means it isn't putting the hardware into S4, which means that you don't get the platform wakeup events.
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |