lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH][RFC] 4K stacks default, not a debug thing any more...?
On 17/07/07, William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote:
> At some point in the past, I wrote:
> >> If at some point one of the pro-4k stacks crowd can prove that all
> >> code paths are safe, or introduce another viable alternative (such as
> >> Matt's idea for extending the stack dynamically), then removing the 8k
> >> stacks option makes sense.
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:54:38PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Any x86-32 path unsafe with 4K stacks is almost certainly unsafe with 8K
> > stacks because the 8K stacks do not have seperate IRQ stack paths, so you
> > have the same space but split. It might be less predictable on 8K stacks
> > but it isn't absent.
>
> At hch's suggestion I rewrote the separate IRQ stack configurability
> patch into one making IRQ stacks mandatory and unconfigurable, and
> hence enabled with 8K stacks.
>
For what it's worth, that sounds good to me - like something that we
would want merged.

--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-18 01:41    [W:0.074 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site