[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Use tty_schedule in VT code.
O> In that case, we might as well just always do the scheduled_delayed_work() 
> with a zero timeout as per the earlier patch. I'd still like to know who
> *cares*, though? Why not leave it at 1?

I don't think it really matters too much on modern systems so long as we
keep the flush_to_ldisc out of IRQ context. Historically we tried to
batch the ldisc processing but I doubt any modern box cares too much
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-18 01:31    [W:0.067 / U:18.232 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site