lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > * Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    >> On 07/13/2007 05:19 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
    >>
    >>> I should really go back to 2.6.21.6, 2.6.22 has many bizarre behaviors
    >>> with FC6. Automount starts taking 30% of CPU (unused at the moment)
    >>>
    >> Can you confirm whether CFS is involved, i.e. does it spin like that
    >> even without the CFS patch applied?
    >>
    >
    >
    I will try that, but not until Tuesday night. I've been here too long
    today and have an out-of-state meeting tomorrow. I'll take a look after
    dinner. Note that the latest 2.6.21 with cfs-v19 doesn't have any
    problems of any nature, other than suspend to RAM not working, and I may
    have the config wrong. Runs really well otherwise, but I'll test drive
    2.6.22 w/o the patch.

    > hmmm .... could you take out the kernel/time.c (sys_time()) changes from
    > the CFS patch, does that solve the automount issue? If yes, could
    > someone take a look at automount and check whether it makes use of
    > time(2) and whether it combines it with finer grained time sources?
    >
    >
    Will do.

    --
    bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
    CTO TMR Associates, Inc
    Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-17 06:25    [W:4.548 / U:0.036 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site