Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:22:48 -0400 | From | Bill Davidsen <> | Subject | Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19 |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> wrote: > > >> On 07/13/2007 05:19 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> >>> I should really go back to 2.6.21.6, 2.6.22 has many bizarre behaviors >>> with FC6. Automount starts taking 30% of CPU (unused at the moment) >>> >> Can you confirm whether CFS is involved, i.e. does it spin like that >> even without the CFS patch applied? >> > > I will try that, but not until Tuesday night. I've been here too long today and have an out-of-state meeting tomorrow. I'll take a look after dinner. Note that the latest 2.6.21 with cfs-v19 doesn't have any problems of any nature, other than suspend to RAM not working, and I may have the config wrong. Runs really well otherwise, but I'll test drive 2.6.22 w/o the patch.
> hmmm .... could you take out the kernel/time.c (sys_time()) changes from > the CFS patch, does that solve the automount issue? If yes, could > someone take a look at automount and check whether it makes use of > time(2) and whether it combines it with finer grained time sources? > > Will do.
-- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |