lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: uninline check_signature()


On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> OR I'll have to disable HAS_IOMEM on m68k, and invent a new Kconfig
> symbol for lots of other stuff that currently depends on HAS_IOMEM...

Well, as far as I'm concerned, you could also make all drivers that
actually need "check_signature()" do a Kconfig level

select CHECK_SIGNATURE

along with a

config CHECK_SIGNATURE
bool
default n

in lib/Kconfig, and thus make it totally independent of any hw/bus
features at all, and simply depend on whether it is needed or not. I'd be
ok with that, and it's certainly "correct" too.

Hmm?

Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-17 22:43    [W:0.087 / U:9.848 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site