lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Hibernation considerations
Date
david@lang.hm writes:

[snip]

> the non-ACPI hibernate behaves very differently, and for some people (and I
> think I am one of them) it will meet their needs better then _any_ of the ACPI
> suspends.

It may have certain differences from the user point of view, but from
the implementation view, it seems that it is nearly exactly the same.
The only differences seem to be:

- rather than shutting down, do whatever is necessary to stick the
system in S4 state.

- make sure ACPI isn't initialized by the "load image" kernel

- rather than "resume from hibernate" ACPI by initializing it normally,
issue the special hibernate-related methods.

Thus, it seems that supporting ACPI S4 will have a very minimal affect
on the hibernate implementation.

--
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-17 22:43    [W:0.192 / U:3.432 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site