Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:13:08 +0200 (CEST) | From | Roman Zippel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table |
| |
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> and note that even on the old scheduler, nice-0 was "3200% more > powerful" than nice +19 (with CONFIG_HZ=300),
How did you get that value? At any HZ the ratio should be around 1:10 (+- rounding error).
> in fact i like it that nice -20 has a slightly bigger punch than it used > to have before:
"Slightly bigger"??? You're joking, right? Especially the user levels are doing something completely different now, which may break user expectation. While the user couldn't expect anything precise, it's still a big difference whether a process at nice 5 gets 75% of the time or only 30%.
bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |