lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
Hi,

On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> and note that even on the old scheduler, nice-0 was "3200% more
> powerful" than nice +19 (with CONFIG_HZ=300),

How did you get that value? At any HZ the ratio should be around 1:10
(+- rounding error).

> in fact i like it that nice -20 has a slightly bigger punch than it used
> to have before:

"Slightly bigger"??? You're joking, right?
Especially the user levels are doing something completely different now,
which may break user expectation. While the user couldn't expect anything
precise, it's still a big difference whether a process at nice 5 gets 75%
of the time or only 30%.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-17 00:17    [W:0.397 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site