lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
    Hi,

    On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:

    > > As soon as you add another loop the difference changes again, while
    > > it's always correct to say it gets 25% more cpu time [...]
    >
    > yep, and i'll add the relative effect to the comment too.

    Why did you cut off the rest of the sentence?
    To illustrate the problem a little different: a task with a nice level -20
    got around 700% more cpu time (or 8 times more), now it gets 8500% more
    cpu time (or 86.7 times more).
    You don't think that change to the nice levels is a little drastic?

    bye, Roman
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-16 14:01    [W:4.091 / U:0.340 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site