Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:58:36 +0200 (CEST) | From | Roman Zippel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table |
| |
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > As soon as you add another loop the difference changes again, while > > it's always correct to say it gets 25% more cpu time [...] > > yep, and i'll add the relative effect to the comment too.
Why did you cut off the rest of the sentence? To illustrate the problem a little different: a task with a nice level -20 got around 700% more cpu time (or 8 times more), now it gets 8500% more cpu time (or 86.7 times more). You don't think that change to the nice levels is a little drastic?
bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |