Messages in this thread | | | From | Ed Tomlinson <> | Subject | Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19 | Date | Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:10:08 +0000 |
| |
On Monday 16 July 2007 05:17, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Ed Tomlinson <edt@aei.ca> wrote: > > > I run a java application at nice 15. Its been a background > > application here for as long as SD and CFS have been around. If I > > have a compile running at nice 0, with v19 java gets so little cpu > > that the the wrapper that runs to monitor it is timing out waiting for > > it to start. This is new in v19 - something in v19 is not meshing > > well with my mix of applications... > > how much longer did the startup of the java app get relative to say v18? > > to debug this, could you check whether this problem goes away if you use > nice 10 (or nice 5) instead of nice 15?
Ingo,
It may take a day to two before I get to test this. I have had to revert to 2.6.21 - it seems that 22 triggers a stall here (21 also can trigger this but its harder)...
Thanks Ed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |