[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: *at syscalls for xattrs?
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 02:13:21PM -0700, Nicholas Miell wrote:
> I suspect he was asking for
> int getxattrat(int fd, const char *path, const char *name, void *value,
> size_t size, int flags)
> int setxattrat(int fd, const char *path, const char *name, void *value,
> size_t size, int xattrflags, int atflags)
> rather than the ability to access xattrs as files.

Just one question: what the bleeding hell for? Not that the rest of family made any damn sense as an interface...

> > > BTW, why is fstatat called fstatat and not statat? (Same goes for
> > > futimesat.) It does not take a file descriptor for the file argument.
> > > Otherwise we'd also need fopenat/funlinkat, etc. Any reasons?
> >
> > Ulrich having an odd taste?
> Solaris compatibility.

"Sun having no taste whatsoever"
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-16 00:27    [W:0.050 / U:12.328 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site