Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 14 Jul 2007 13:47:14 -0700 | From | "Nish Aravamudan" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Add nid sanity on alloc_pages_node |
| |
On 7/14/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:40:25 -0700 "Nish Aravamudan" <nish.aravamudan@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 7/13/07, Joe Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Patch gone too ;) I deleted it. I was hoping that you'd send me the final > > > > finished product (please). > > > > > > > > > > Ha.., the patch against 2.6.22, at your patch have use htlb_alloc_mask, but I > > > cannot found it at 2.6.22 kernel tree, I think you must use difference kernel > > > tree :) > > > > I believe this patch will be unnecessary if my "Fix hugetlb pool > > allocation with empty nodes" patch gets pulled into -mm. > > alloc_fresh_huge_page() now takes a mempolicy which is created by the > > two callers, rather than reinventing interleaving itself. I believe > > this will avoid the oops you saw. I am still waiting on some test > > results (annoying -mm config changes) before I repost them (and they > > depend on Christoph's fixes for memoryless nodes). > > Could be so, but the patch which I have queued is nice and simple and > can be backported into 2.6.22.x.
Fair enough. FWIW, just finished testing my patches and have posted the current incarnation to linux-mm.
Thanks, Nish - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |