[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [kvm-devel] [PATCH][RFC] kvm-scheduler integration
    Avi Kivity wrote:
    >> The
    >> congruent case which comes to mind is lazy FPU handling.
    > That one has preempt_ops in hardware: cr0.ts and #NM.

    However, that doesn't handle in-kernel use of the fpu.
    kernel_fpu_begin()/kernel_fpu_end() could easily be modified to take
    advantage of a generic preempt hook. I'll add a patch for that, and we
    gain preemptible raid-5 parity calculation.

    error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-07-11 08:21    [W:0.018 / U:2.488 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site