[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [kvm-devel] [PATCH][RFC] kvm-scheduler integration
Avi Kivity wrote:
>> The
>> congruent case which comes to mind is lazy FPU handling.
> That one has preempt_ops in hardware: cr0.ts and #NM.

However, that doesn't handle in-kernel use of the fpu.
kernel_fpu_begin()/kernel_fpu_end() could easily be modified to take
advantage of a generic preempt hook. I'll add a patch for that, and we
gain preemptible raid-5 parity calculation.

error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-11 08:21    [W:0.059 / U:18.504 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site