Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 8 Jun 2007 20:48:36 +0100 | From | Alan Cox <> | Subject | Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2 |
| |
> So, what do you plan to do? Those handle won't be zero-based. Your > "working" system I immagine will do: > > bleeh[handle - BASE].duh = ...; > > How nice for a working system. If you *store* the handle returned by the > OS, and you *use* the handle to call for OS services, you will be fine > independently from the value handed out by the OS.
Well there are two ways I'd do this
#1: Throw the whole thing away and accept its not a good idea anyway
#2: If I was really going this way and I wanted to use it for serious tricks for high performance I/O then I'd provide the handle from userspace so that the strategy for allocation is controlled by the caller who is the only one who can make the smart decisions - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |